6 quotes from 1 episode on M&A Science, each with a timestamped link to the source.
6 quotes1 episode
The short version
Bill Stone notes that strategic buyers defeat private equity firms in contested takeovers by cutting corporate overhead. Inside private equity deals, founders lose all control over liquidity timing when sponsors hold a 70% stake against a 30% founder share.
Most interesting insights
Public market volatility destroyed almost half of a secondary offering value, dropping the stock price from $34 to $19.50 per share.
“The last time I went to Wall Street to do a secondary, when we announced our secondary, our stock was at $34 a share. And when we priced it, we got 19.50. I didn't like that, so we lost not quite half of our value in that process.”
Strategic acquirers win contested deals by cutting public company costs. Eliminating redundant legal departments, chief financial officers, and auditor retainers allows buyers to compress high entry multiples rapidly.
“Usually against private equity, I can always win…”
Holding 30% of a company leaves founders powerless on sponsor-level decisions. A private equity firm with a 70% stake controls liquidity timing, rendering formal board votes entirely irrelevant.
“Okay, Bud, I got it. Let's vote. Okay, you got 70. I got 30. I think I lose.”
Board unanimity means nothing when sponsor headquarters decides otherwise; SS&C's board voted unanimously to go public in 2007, but Carlyle leadership in Washington killed the IPO.
Majority equity dictates liquidity timing: Carlyle held 70% of SS&C while Bill Stone retained 30%, making formal board votes irrelevant on sponsor-level decisions.
Bill Stone scaled SS&C Technologies across nearly 100 acquisitions by eliminating duplicate corporate functions that buyout sponsors cannot remove.
In one transaction, SS&C paid $165 million for $11 million in EBITDA (a 15x entry multiple) and compressed the purchase multiple to just over 3x within twelve months by stripping out public company overhead.
How we attribute quotes. Every quote was matched against the episode transcript, so the words and the timestamp are real (we trim filler words like "um", nothing else). The name comes from our written summary of the episode. YouTube gives us no voice-by-voice transcript, so open the timestamp to hear who is talking. See a wrong name? Tell us and we fix or remove it.