Key Takeaways

  • Kenji Yoshino outlines three stages of dealing with stigma: conversion (trying to change your identity), passing (hiding your identity entirely), and covering (keeping your identity visible but muting your behavior).
  • Passing hides the fact of an identity; covering manages the discomfort of the dominant group. Yoshino points to historical figures like Franklin Delano Roosevelt hiding his wheelchair behind desks and Margaret Thatcher taking voice training to lower her pitch.
  • While immutable traits like race make conversion or passing impossible, covering targets behavioral traits, forcing people to police speech, dress, and references to family.
  • Downplaying identity burns daily cognitive energy. Teams that think they have eliminated discrimination often just push team members from passing into covering.

The Three Demands Society Makes on Difference

Most modern leaders assume that if someone feels comfortable being out at work, the company culture has won. Legal scholar Kenji Yoshino argues that assumption ignores a quieter tax employees pay every day.

Yoshino identifies three distinct historical demands placed on people with non-dominant identities. The first demand is conversion: you are ordered to alter who you are. Yoshino remembers growing up praying that he could change his sexual orientation. When conversion failed, society shifted its demand to passing: keep your identity, but lock it behind a closet door so nobody sees it.

“So, if the first phase was trying to convert and responding to really the demand for conversion, which I experienced in society at large, the second phase was, 'I'm not going to convert, but I am going to pass,'” (play from 22:28) Yoshino says.

The third demand is covering. Here, society allows you to claim your identity publicly, provided you mute every behavioral sign of it so dominant groups remain comfortable. As Yoshino explains: “You don't need to be in the closet, i.e., you don't need to pass. But you do need to, as you put it, Shankar, not flaunt. You need to downplay, mute, edit your identity so that the rest of us can feel more comfortable around you.” (play from 30:15)

The Energy Drain of Behavioral Editing

Covering is not restricted to sexual orientation. While immutable traits prevent people from passing or converting, covering targets behavior, making it nearly universal across marginalized groups.

“So, if you have an immutable identity like race, you're going to be limited in how much you can convert that or pass,” (play from 36:54) Yoshino observes. “But notice what happens when we get to covering. Covering demands direct themselves at the behavioral aspects of an identity.” (play from 37:03)

History shows how leaders carry this burden. Franklin Delano Roosevelt knew the public was aware of his paralysis, yet he orchestrated public appearances so he was almost always seated behind a desk or supported on someone's arm, muting the visual presence of his wheelchair. Margaret Thatcher worked with a speech coach to lower her vocal register, neutralizing the pitch of her voice to fit the masculine expectations of British politics.

Yoshino notes that sociologist Erving Goffman pointed out that people who cannot or will not hide their identity “nonetheless expend an enormous amount of energy to downplay that identity so that others around them can have greater comfort.” (play from 32:22) In a high-growth company, this tax is real. When your engineers or sales reps spend attention editing how they talk about their weekend, softening their tone, or monitoring their mannerisms, that energy is stolen directly from building product and solving hard problems.

What to Do With This

Run an audit on the informal norms inside your team this week. Look at the last three social channels or all-hands meetings and ask: what personal topics, family structures, or outside interests are visibly discussed by leaders, and what parts of life stay hidden? At your next team retro, state explicitly that employees do not need to edit out their real lives, accents, or domestic realities to be taken seriously as performers.