5 quotes from 1 episode on How I Invest, each with a timestamped link to the source.
5 quotes1 episode
The short version
Leo Polovets views high meeting volumes as the foundation for accurate pattern recognition in venture capital. Leo Polovets avoids heavily funded hardware categories like humanoid robotics, questioning if manufacturers scaling to 10 million units will ever rely on third-party suppliers.
Most interesting insights
General-purpose humanoid robots currently lack the efficiency of specialized arms for repetitive industrial tasks.
“I think what they're not good at so far is like efficiency…”
Seed investors struggle to enter the humanoid robotics market
Leo Polovets avoids early humanoid robotics rounds despite predicting a trillion-dollar winner. Incumbents hold large capital advantages, making seed entry mathematically unappealing.
“I think humanoids are like a really hard category to invest in. So we haven't done investments in this space and I feel like we're pretty unlikely to because it's very well funded.”
Scaled robotics makers will build their own components
Hardware companies building actuators and sensors face verticalization risks. Leo Polovets asks if manufacturers deploying 10 million units will continue buying third-party parts or develop their own.
“Let's say Figure or Optimus takes off and they have a million robots in the field or 10 million robots in the field in 10 years. Are they still going to buy their actuators from a third party or are they going to develop their own?”
High meeting volume creates accurate deal pattern recognition
Limiting pitch meetings leaves investors poorly calibrated. Leo Polovets finds it difficult to identify successful startup companies without taking high volumes of meetings.
“It's very hard to pick out companies if you just don't take a lot of meetings…”
Leo Polovets points to the classic pottery class experiment to explain deal calibration: volume drives pattern recognition, while limiting dealflow to one curated pitch a week leaves investors poorly calibrated.
Susa Ventures missed out on Checkr and Faire during their first rounds because both companies skipped standard seed pricing and jumped directly to Series A valuations.
How we attribute quotes. Every quote was matched against the episode transcript, so the words and the timestamp are real (we trim filler words like "um", nothing else). The name comes from our written summary of the episode, and we use it only when a separate check of the captions finds that person on the episode. YouTube gives us no voice-by-voice transcript, so open the timestamp to hear who is talking. See a wrong name? Tell us and we fix or remove it.